FACTORS AFFECTING EMPLOYEE RETENTION
Compensation
Trevor et al. (1997) demonstrated that
wage growth has a negative effect on turnover. Davies, Taylor, & Savery
(2001) presented the opinion that every organization pays compensation to the
best employees, but very few organizations use it strategically. They said,
“Salary and benefits policies are not being used strategically, within the
organization to improve morale, reduce turnover, and achieve targets within an
establishment”. Gardner et al., (2004) explained that the salary can be a
motivation factor to keep the employee within the organization.
Reward and recognition
The term ‘reward’ was
defined by Agarwal (1998) as something that the organization delivers to the
employees in response to the job and performance and something that the
employees desire.
Walker (2001) asserts that
praise from superiors, coworkers, and clients increase loyalty. In the year
2002, the international consulting firm "Watson Wyatt" carried out a
study in the USA, surveyed 12750 workers across all career levels and throughout
all significant industry sectors to learn about their perspectives regard their
employers and place of employment. According to the report, acknowledgment is
crucial for employees, and they want to hear that the job they did was
recognized and valued.
Promotion and Opportunity
for growth
Pergamit and Veum (1989)
discovered a strong link between promotions and job satisfaction help to retain
employees longer. According to research by Meyer et al (2003), Internal career
development of employees is frequently the best indicator of an employee's
effective performance. Prince (2005) stated that skilled workers are necessary
for retaining a competitive advantage and employees seek out career development
chances to advance in their careers.
Participation in decision-making
Hewitt (2002), describes
modern organizations always keep their employees properly informed about all of
the significant business matters and involve them in decision-making at all
levels so that they may take advantage of their talents. Supporting this point
of view, Noah (2008) discovered in his research that employee participation in
decision-making aids in the development of a sense of belongingness among the
workers, which aids in the creation of a good congenial working environment and
aids in the development of a good employer-employee relationship.
Work-life balance and employee retention
Hyman et al.
(2003) in their empirical study conducted in the UK, discovered that forcing
work obligations into employees' personal lives (such as working on the
weekend) led to increased stress and emotional tiredness.
According to a
2006 research by the Australian Telework Advisory Committee, 70% of companies
that offered telework choices noted a variety of advantages, including enhanced
business productivity, lower costs, improved employee flexibility and work-life
balance, and higher workforce engagement.
Work environment and employee retention
Wells &
Thelen (2002), stated that organizations with generous human resource policies
have a very good chance of retaining workers by giving them an appropriate
level of privacy and sound management of the workplace, which increases
employees' motivation levels to commit to the company for the long term.
Ramlall (2003) emphasized that considering an employer's particular needs into
account will encourage commitment and a comfortable working environment.
Training and Development and Employee
Retention
Investment in
employee training and career development is one of the key determinants in
employee retention. According to Messmer (2000), every organization makes
investments in the form of training and development for those employees who
they anticipate will provide a return on their investment. Tomlinson (2002)
advanced the idea that businesses can maintain a competitive edge by investing
in employee training on the newest technologies. According to Garg &
Rastogi (2006), employees' feedback is crucial for firms in today's competitive
environment since the more knowledge an employee has, the better they will
perform and be able to handle the market problems.
Leadership and Employee Retention
Eisenberger and associates
(1990) explains, a worker's relationship with their boss has a significant
impact on how they view the company. McNeese-Smith (1995), in his study on the Leadership
behavior of hospital directors, reported finding a substantial positive
correlation between staff loyalty to the organization, productivity, and job
happiness. According to Brunetto and Farr-Wharton (2002) , immediate manager
supervision raises workers' levels of job satisfaction in the public sector.
According to research by Chung-Hsiung Fang, Sue-Ting Chang, and Guan-Li Chen (2009)
, leadership style can positively influence organizational commitment and work
satisfaction, and work satisfaction can positively influence organizational
commitment and work performance.
Job Security and Employee Retention
Abegglen (1958)
discovered during a research among Japanese workers, that employment
characteristics including a lifelong employment, seniority structure, job
security, and high commitment: lead to high job satisfaction and employee
retention. Ashford et al. (1989) and davy et al. (1991), have discovered that
job discontent results from employee insecurity. Rosenblatt and Ruvio (1996), discovered
a negative relationship between job insecurity and organizational commitment
and job performance.
References
- Abegglen, J.C (1958). The Japanese Factory. Aspects of Its Social Organization. Free Press. Glencoe. IL.
- Agarwal, N.C. (1998). “Reward Systems: Emerging Trends and Issues”. CanadianPsychology, 39(1), 60-70.
- Ashford, S, Lee,C & Bobko, P. (1989). “Content, causes, and consequences of job insecurity: A theory-based measure and substantive test”, Academy of Management Journal., 32: 803-829.
- Australian Telework Advisory Committee Report(2006). Telework for Australian Employees and Businesses: Maximising the Economic and Social Benefits of Flexible Working Practices.
- Brunetto Y, Farr-Wharton R (2002). “Using social identity theory to explain the job satisfaction of public sector employees”. International Journal of Public Sector Manage, 15 (7): 534-551.
- Chung-Hsiung Fang, Sue-Ting Chang, Guan-Li Chen (2009) “Applying Structural Equation Model to Study of the Relationship Model among leadership style, satisfaction, Organization commitment and Performance in hospital industry”.
- Davies, D., Taylor,R., Savery, C (2001). “The role of appraisal, remuneration and training in improving staff relations in the Western Australian accommodation industry: A comparative study”. Journal of European Training, 25 (6/7). 366-373.
- Davy J, Kinicki A, Scheck C (1991). Developing and testing a model ofsurvivor responses to layoffs. Journal of Vocational Behaviour. 38: 302-317
- Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). “Percieved organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 51-59.
- Gardner DG, Van Dyne L, Pierce JL (2004). The effects of pay level on organization-based self-esteem and performance: a field study. Journal of Occup. Organ. Psychology., 77(3): 307-322.
- Garg, P. & Rastongi, R. (2006). New model of job design motivation employees Performance. Journal of Management Development.
- Hewitt, P. (2002). High Performance Workplaces: The Role of Employee Involvement in a Modern Economy. www.berr.gov.uk/files/file26555.pdf
- McNeese-Smith D., “Job Satisfaction, Productivity, and Organizational Commitment”. Journal of Nurse Association, 25(9), 1995. 17-26.
- Messmer, M. (2000). Orientations programs can be key to employee retention. In Strategic Finance. 81 (8):12-15.
- Meyer, John, Laryssa Topolnytsky, Henryk Krajewski and Ian Gellatly (2003). Best Practices: Employee Retention. Toronto: Tomson-Carswell.
- Noah, Y. (2008) A Study of Worker Participation in Management Decision Making Within Selected Establishments in Lagos, Nigeria. Journal of Social Science, 17 (1): 31-39.
- Pergamit, M. R. and Veum, J. R. (1999), “What is a promotion?” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 52 No. 4, pp. 581- 601.
- Prince, B.J. (2005). Career-focused employee transfer processes. Career Development International, 10(4), 293-309.
- Ramlall, S. (2003). Managing Employee Retention as a Strategy for Increasing Organizational Competitiveness, Applied H.R.M. Research, 8(2), 63-72.
- Rosenblatt Z, Ruvio A (1996). A test of a multidimensional model of job insecurity. The case of Israeli teachers. Journal of Organisational Behaviour., 17: 587- 605.
- Tomlinson, A. (2002). High Technology workers want Respect. Survey Canadian Human Resources Reporter, vol. 15, issue 3, and p.2.
- Trevor CO, Gerhart B, Boudreau JW (1997). Voluntary turnover and job performance: curvilinear and the moderating influences of salary growth and promotions. Journal of Applied. Psychology., 82(1): 44-61.
- Watson, Wyatt. (1999). Work USA 2000: Employee commitment and the bottom line. Bethesda, MD: Watson Wyatt. pp: 43-58.
- Wells, M., & Thelen, L. (2002) “What does your workspace say about you? The influence of personality, status and workspace on personalization.” Environment and Behavior, 3: 300-321.
Very informative article. The factors that you have mentioned directly affect employee motivation. It can also be seen that failing to provide the employees with these factors would result in the lack of motivation and cause the employees to leave the company. Continuously failing in this would subsequently increase the employee turnover rate which is highly disadvantageous to the organization.
ReplyDeleteThere are quite a few studies in the work domain that have examined motivation as a mechanism between rewards and turnover intention, but even these studies have focused on one type of reward (monetary or non-monetary), and their findings on the link between compensation and autonomous motivation are inconsistent. For example, Gillet et al. (2013) used autonomous motivation as a mechanism between rewards and turnover intention, but the authors included only non-monetary aspects of rewards.
DeleteClear structure of career path is one essential factor for employee retention. According to (Sarrat, 2017) Career growth is another essential factor considered by the potential candidates. According to studies, employees are more likely to stay with a company that provides opportunities for advancement. No outstanding talent will stay in a confined job for years when their qualifications, experience, and professional advancement allow them to explore better options. Clearing avenues to advancement and recognizing current employees for available management roles is an efficient strategy to retain your top personnel.
ReplyDeleteGarg & Rastogi (2006), emphasized that employees' input is important for organizations in today's competitive world, and the more knowledge an employee gains, the better he or she will perform and handle the market's challenges on a global scale.
DeleteEmployee retention can be defined as the ability of an organization to retain its employees,
ReplyDeleteespecially the most talented ones. Employee retention has become a significant concern issue. Some shocking statistics confronting every employer are presented in workforce demographics. More than 13% of employees in the United States quit their jobs each month. 55% of employees in the U.S contemplate on quitting their job within a given year (Wiley, 2011)
Fitz-enz (1990), recognized that a number of factors affect employee retention, not just one. Management must take into account elements like pay and benefits, job stability, training and advancement, supervisor support culture, workplace atmosphere, organizational justice, etc.
DeleteCleary explained. A more detailed and recent definition for the
ReplyDeleteconcept of retention is “customer liking, identification, commitment, trust, readiness to recommend, and repurchase intentions, with the first four being emotional-cognitive retention constructs, and the last two being behavioral intentions” (Stauss et al., 2001).
Harrington et al. (2001) examined the various predictors of intentions to leave a job and observed that emotional exhaustion; lower levels of intrinsic job satisfaction and dissatisfaction with salary and promotional opportunities were the main predictors.
DeleteLack of commitment is the most influential factor for an employee quitting an organization. The current human resource practices found that a good work environment, support from the manager and training & development provided are the variables most applicable to increasing commitment towards the organization (Umamaheswari and Krishnan, 2016).
ReplyDeleteIt is not surprising that employee commitment is a fundamental activity
Deletefor the success of an organization. Every employee has a desire to reach his self-actualization motivational level (Dorenbosch & Veldhoven, 2006).